I believe I'm not alone in this. When chatting with friends post-class, they all felt the same too. They felt energised (not physically, coz it's a night class mind you, but in passion and drive) to explore this new space that we call qualitative study. We're absorbing the class like a sponge.
Dr Lateef structured the class in a way that make it more interesting to be in to. He usually starts it with some housekeeping. Either he makes a few announcements, or students ask him questions that has been nagging them for a while. And then, we have the presentation from the group assigned. While this go on, he'll chirped in to share his thoughts and describe the issues at hand in a more relatable way. He'll emphasise and re-emphasise points that we should be focusing on and also give useful practical tips on how to address certain issue. What I like about his way in joining or assisting the presentation are his politeness and tact in doing it. He would acknowledge the ideas of the presenter and ask for clarification if need so. He would also open the discussion to any issue he felt relevant and somehow 'force' us to think of the best way to approach it. We would respond to the issue as we know best, and he'll acknowledge it and keep on nudging us to the right direction. Sometimes one of us gets the most suitable response, but sometimes we didn't. In the end, he'll wrap up the discussion by throwing out other possible options and the different context that we can view the issue. He almost never prescribe the 'best' way to do things. He will just guide you on how to think of the best solution in any given situation, this is by having a strong guiding principle in qualitative study that we are learning about.
Pheww! That felt good to be written out. I think I almost never felt a class as inspiring and invigoratingly exciting to my passion and drive before. Everything he said hit the right spot? or maybe it's the timing, now I need it more than before. I dunno. But what I do know is I love his class.
Ok, so, yesterday was class as usual, and although we have discuss this point a few times before, I felt like it's yesterday that I come to a realisation of what it truly means. Now do I understand it on a deeper level. And it felt almost like I see lights at the end of the tunnel. Hahaha, maybe not to that extent. But, something along that line.
What was it that I have actually come to a realisation about if you ask?
-
That writing is not an end product which you do after you are sure that you have everything you need before you start. Instead, writing is a process in itself. It is a process of generating ideas and thoughts. It forces us to put into words and sentences those abstract ideas in our head. The moment we start writing, that is when our head will start whirring and being active to churn out new ideas. So, this is a cycle that needs to be repeated to reach a level where we are at ease with
So, that's generally what I have a realisation about. It also answers my question on people who say they are constantly writing their thesis. It actually mean that they are doing a process of thinking, through writing and more writing of their thesis. The writing is the process of reaching to certain understanding of what they are doing. It's not merely something that you do in the end after you are done with the previous phase. But, bear in mind, this view on writing as a way of generating new ideas could be best explain those who are doing a qualitative study. Because the nature of qualitative study makes it an iterative (cycle) process as compared to the quantitative one. Qualitative study also demand the researcher to keep on revisiting the previous point and weaving it nicely together with the new ones in the latter. Which in my point a very difficult thing to do.
Fuhh...! Still a lot more to do and learn. Till next post then.
Well, a selfie here wouldn't hurt right?
Aishah ZA